Hidden Impacts Of Chinese Influence On Western Maritime Security Revealed

Cargo ship and truck at a busy port.

Amid growing geopolitical tensions, China’s expanding influence in the maritime industry raises significant concerns for U.S. national security in the Western Hemisphere.

Key Insights

  • China has dramatically increased its investment in Latin American infrastructure, raising U.S. security concerns.
  • Chinese control over U.S. and regional ports poses potential intelligence and military risks.
  • The Panama Canal is a strategic chokepoint affected by Chinese influence.
  • Calls for the U.S. to counter China’s influence through strategic partnerships and infrastructure investments.
  • Debates over Chinese port investments emphasize national and regional security implications.

China’s Expanding Footprint in Latin America

The strategic competition between the United States and China has intensified in Latin America, with China’s engagement significantly increasing over the past two decades. Economic, diplomatic, and geopolitical interests have driven this surge. In 2002, trade between China and Latin America was $18 billion, skyrocketing to over $450 billion by 2022. This growth includes substantial investments in energy, infrastructure, and trade dynamics.

The Chancay Port in Peru, 60% owned by China’s COSCO Shipping, has become a crucial asset, reducing shipping time between China and South America by about ten days. U.S. policymakers are encouraged to focus on cultural and personal linkages with Latin America to counterbalance China’s growing influence and promote good governance.

Security Concerns Over Strategic Chokepoints

Chinese investments in ports within the Western Hemisphere, including control over vital infrastructure like the Panama Canal, pose significant security challenges. The Homeland Security Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security recently examined these threats, emphasizing China’s potential use of port operations for power projection, surveillance, and disrupting U.S. military logistics.

Leland Lazarus, an expert on the matter, said, “PRC infrastructure projects could be “dual-use”—blending commercial and security purposes.”

China’s control over the Panama Canal is particularly concerning due to shipping fentanyl precursors and using surveillance technology to gather sensitive information. These operations could hinder trade and impact U.S. naval capabilities in times of conflict. The U.S. aims to prevent foreign adversaries from controlling critical infrastructure, invoking strategies aligned with the Monroe Doctrine principles.

U.S. Response to Chinese Influence

The U.S. government, alongside industry partners, is actively working to identify and mitigate risks associated with Chinese technology and infrastructure. Initiatives such as the rejection of LOGINK software at U.S. ports highlight successful collaborative efforts to safeguard national security interests. Proposals are also in place to strengthen U.S. maritime strategy, including a potential Chinese port buyback program to reduce reliance on foreign entities.

Valerie Wirtschafter, a fellow at the Brookings Institute, said, “A new “Cold War” is bound to backfire in Latin America.”

With China securing infrastructure agreements in countries like Panama, Peru, Brazil, Mexico, Antigua, and Jamaica, U.S. defense analysts remain vigilant of China’s ability to exploit these investments for intelligence gathering. The evolving geopolitical landscape calls for robust measures to counter the multidimensional challenges posed by China’s strategic port investments.

Sources:

  1. How are the United States and China intersecting in Latin America?
  2. Wakeup Call: The U.S. Risks Losing Latin America to China | The Heritage Foundation
  3. “Strategic Maritime Chokepoints”: Subcommittee Hearing Examines Threats from China’s Influence Over Panama Canal, Western Hemisphere Ports – Committee on Homeland Security
  4. Experts Warn of China’s Grip on Key US and Latin American Ports | The Epoch Times