How Steep Cuts Shaped Election Security Under Trump Administration

Man with headset working at computer, holographic icons.

Trump administration cuts $10 million from cybersecurity funding, leaving election security programs in limbo while officials scramble to assess the impact.

Key Insights

The Trump administration has halted approximately $10 million in annual federal funding for two critical cybersecurity programs that support election security.
Affected programs include the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center, which provided cyber threat intelligence to election offices.
Over a dozen CISA staff members have been placed on administrative leave during an internal review of the agency’s election-related work.
State election officials from Minnesota and Maine have expressed concerns about the impact on their ability to secure election infrastructure.

Federal Funding Halted for Critical Election Security Programs

The Trump administration has suspended approximately $10 million in annual funding for two major cybersecurity programs that play crucial roles in securing America’s elections. This decision affects the nonprofit Center for Internet Security, which operates the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC) and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC). These programs provide essential cyber threat intelligence and incident response support to election offices and local governments across the country. The funding cut comes as part of a broader review of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) election-related work.

State election officials are now grappling with the immediate consequences of this decision. The National Association of Secretaries of State has already requested clarification on how these funding cuts will impact election security operations. Without these resources, many states and local jurisdictions may struggle to maintain robust cybersecurity measures needed to protect voting systems and election infrastructure from increasingly sophisticated threats.

State Officials Voice Concerns Over Security Gaps

State election officials who relied on these programs have expressed alarm about the potential security gaps this funding cut could create. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized the value of the affected programs, stating, “We got a lot out of it.” The programs provided crucial resources that many state election offices would struggle to replicate independently, particularly smaller jurisdictions with limited budgets for cybersecurity. The timing of these cuts is particularly concerning as states prepare for what is expected to be a highly contested election cycle.

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows said of the recent cuts, “We will find a way to protect our elections.”

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows highlighted the importance of these information-sharing initiatives in countering cyber threats during previous elections. She criticized the elimination of these programs as inefficient and potentially dangerous given the sophistication of current cyber threats targeting election systems. Without federal support, states will need to develop alternative strategies to maintain their cybersecurity posture, potentially creating inconsistent security standards across different jurisdictions.

CISA Leadership in Transition Amid Review

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, established in 2018, is responsible for securing critical infrastructure including voting systems. Currently, the agency faces uncertainty as President Trump has not yet nominated a director. Additionally, over a dozen staff members have been placed on administrative leave during an internal review that is not intended for public release. This leadership vacuum comes at a time when cybersecurity experts warn that election systems could be more vulnerable to attacks.

CISA has faced criticism from Republicans for its past efforts to counter misinformation about the 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic. The current review appears to be part of a broader reassessment of the agency’s role in election security. Election security experts, including Larry Norden from the Brennan Center for Justice, have warned that these changes could increase vulnerability to cyberattacks at a time when foreign adversaries continue to target American election infrastructure.