A named former Fox colleague says Kimberly Guilfoyle showed intimate photos alongside an American Express Black Card image, reviving past allegations from her Fox News exit and intensifying questions about standards for people in power.
Story Highlights
- A former Fox colleague alleges Guilfoyle showed explicit images and an American Express Black Card photo.
- Reports describe sexual talk and lewd image-sharing during Guilfoyle’s Fox tenure.
- CNN previously reported Fox paid a former assistant over $4 million after a 2018 complaint.
- Guilfoyle denies workplace misconduct and calls the new claims false.
What the former colleague says happened
New reporting quotes Montgomery, a named former colleague, who says Kimberly Guilfoyle displayed images of a man’s American Express Black Card, both front and back, and also showed intimate photos of the same person’s body. The account says the display happened in front of several friends or coworkers from Fox. The reporting also describes “cavalier” sexual talk tied to Guilfoyle’s personal life while she worked at the network.
Montgomery’s account is detailed. It identifies the type of images, the audience, and the setting around Fox-era social and work circles. The report says the conduct included graphic sexual discussion and photographs of male genitalia shown to colleagues or friends. These claims add new, specific examples to a public record that already included earlier reporting on sexually charged behavior linked to Guilfoyle’s time at Fox.
How this relates to earlier Fox-era allegations
In 2018, a former assistant prepared a 42-page draft complaint that described sexual harassment and alleged Guilfoyle showed lewd photos of men’s genitalia to colleagues. The New Yorker reported on that draft complaint, which it said was sent to Fox executives. CNN later reported that Fox paid the assistant more than $4 million to avoid trial. The reporting did not produce a court ruling on the claims, but the payment and documents became part of the public record.
The new allegation from Montgomery is not identical to the 2018 assistant’s claims, which focused on treatment of a subordinate. But the themes overlap: sexualized talk and the display of intimate images near the workplace. That pattern matters because it ties today’s report to earlier, documented disputes around the same person and period. The connection helps readers see how allegations can persist across different venues and years.
Guilfoyle’s response and the credibility clash
Guilfoyle rejects the allegations. She has said she never engaged in any workplace misconduct and called the latest claims false. Her denials appeared in coverage that also carried Montgomery’s account, placing both statements side by side for readers. The reporting does not cite a court decision that resolves the conflict between the two accounts. The public is left weighing a named witness’s story against Guilfoyle’s categorical denial.
🚨Ranking Member Robert Garcia in his letter to former U.S. ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle:
I request you provide the following by October 22, 2026:
1. All communications between you and the following persons from January 1,
2024, to the present:a. Mr. Drew Lynch… https://t.co/4mK5Estsnj
— FonsFlacko (@FonsFlacko) October 15, 2026
Because these allegations resurface while public service and media power overlap, the stakes are broader than one person’s conduct. Many Americans across the political spectrum worry that elites play by separate rules. When networks pay large settlements without trial and insiders trade stories of improper behavior, trust erodes. People see a system that protects reputations first and fixes problems later, if ever. That view feeds a shared belief that the government and major institutions are failing regular citizens.
Why this matters beyond Fox and politics
Employment disputes that involve sexual content remain common. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported 88,531 discrimination charges in fiscal year 2024, with harassment listed in about 40 percent of cases. Sex-based harassment claims formed a significant share of filings, and overall charge volume rose compared with the year before. These numbers do not prove any one case. They do show how often workers turn to formal systems when lines are crossed at work.
This story also highlights three overlapping systems with different rules: workplace-harassment reporting, partisan media battles, and political reputations. Human resources processes focus on policy and risk. News outlets chase named sources and documents. Politics often frames everything as attack or defense. When these systems collide, the outcome can feel more like brand management than truth-finding. That is why named accounts, documented complaints, and clear policies all matter for public trust.
What to watch next
Watch for new named witnesses, documents, or messages that confirm who saw what and when. Look for whether Fox-era policies or investigations surface with more detail, including interviews or internal findings. Track whether Montgomery or others provide sworn statements. Strong records can move a claim from allegation to established fact. Without them, the public is asked to decide in a fog, which serves insiders far more than it serves citizens.
Sources:
nypost.com, washingtonexaminer.com, ibtimes.sg, en.wikipedia.org
© nationalusnews.com 2026. All rights reserved.
