A federal judge said President Trump could not fire Seattle’s court‑appointed top prosecutor, restoring him to the job and igniting a new powers fight.
Story Snapshot
- A judge ruled the President cannot remove a court-appointed U.S. attorney and reinstated Roger Rogoff.
- Rogoff was sworn in and then told he was removed less than an hour later, triggering a lawsuit.
- The court said Rogoff has held the office lawfully since his July 15 oath.
- The Justice Department argues the President retains removal power over any U.S. attorney.
What the Court Decided and Why It Matters
Chief Judge Stanley Bastian ruled on October 1 that the President cannot unilaterally fire a United States attorney who was appointed by the district court. The decision restored Roger Rogoff to the post in the Western District of Washington while the case proceeds. The judge said allowing a removal would undercut the legal framework Congress set for filling vacancies. The order blocks the White House and the Justice Department from treating anyone else as U.S. attorney for now.
Reporters at the hearing said Judge Bastian also found that Rogoff has been the rightful officeholder since the moment he took the oath on July 15. That finding anchors his authority to run the office day to day. It also prevents confusion in ongoing cases and investigations. The court’s stance turns a technical vacancies fight into a live test of limits on presidential control of federal prosecutors in unusual vacancy situations.
How This Clash Started
Judges in the Western District of Washington used their legal power under the vacancies law to appoint Rogoff after a long vacancy. Minutes after Rogoff was sworn in, an email relayed that the President had removed him. That swift reversal sparked a lawsuit and a rapid court review. The timing, less than an hour from oath to ouster, highlighted the stakes and drew national attention to who controls interim law enforcement leadership.
The district’s general order made the appointment formal and public. It stated that Roger Scott Rogoff was authorized to serve as United States attorney for the district. That document shows the court followed its process and intended Rogoff to lead the office until the vacancy was filled through the normal confirmation route. The order’s language became a key pillar for the court’s later ruling to keep Rogoff in place during the case.
The Trump Administration’s Counterargument
The Justice Department says the President can remove any United States attorney, even one appointed by judges, because prosecutors are executive branch officers. Officials argue that appointment by judges keeps the office running, but removal power stays with the President to ensure accountability. That view tracks past executive branch opinions and some commentary, and the department has signaled it will continue to defend that position on appeal.
JUST IN: A federal judge has ordered the reinstatement of a Seattle prosecutor President Donald Trump fired less than an hour after judges appointed him.
Chief Judge Stanley Bastian ordered Roger Rogoff put back in the job while his lawsuit continues. Rogoff sued in July after…
— The Epoch Times (@EpochTimes) October 2, 2026
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche also criticized the local judges’ process, saying they bypassed consultation with the administration before choosing Rogoff. The department maintains the firing fell within executive authority, and that courts cannot lock the President out of managing federal prosecutors. The court disagreed at this stage, but the legal fight is not over. An appeal could reset the rules that offices rely on when vacancies drag on.
Why People Across the Spectrum Care
This ruling hits shared worries about power and accountability. Many Americans see Washington’s turf battles as distractions from public safety, inflation, and fairness. Supporters of the court’s move say it shields local justice work from political whiplash. Backers of the President’s view say voters must be able to hold leaders responsible for prosecutors’ choices. Both sides agree on one point: the system for filling key jobs has broken down and needs clearer limits and timelines.
What Comes Next and What to Watch
The order is a preliminary step, not a final ruling. An appeal by the Justice Department could reach higher courts and set a nationwide rule for court‑appointed prosecutors. Watch for the written opinion to spell out the statutes and history the judge relied on. Also watch how ongoing cases in Seattle proceed under Rogoff’s reinstated leadership. The bigger question remains whether Congress and the White House can fix vacancy gridlock so communities are not caught in the crossfire.
Sources:
washingtontimes.com, wawd.uscourts.gov, cnn.com
© nationalusnews.com 2026. All rights reserved.
